Twitter

Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter
Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

Thursday, May 1, 2014

In reference to FB post by Alok Biswas,Dr Sen`s statement regarding is quite insignificant for me.Narendra Modi is not a factor,the factor is the institution of mass destruction which has already taken over the society,polity,economy and culture.

In reference to FB post by Alok Biswas,Dr Sen`s statement regarding is quite insignificant for me.Narendra Modi is not a factor,the factor is the institution of mass destruction which has already taken over the society,polity,economy and culture.


The economists are known for opportunist statesmanship.They never do address the issues which may unite the masses in resistance.



Palash Biswas


अंतःस्थल - कविताभूमि: Why not Tamil or Gond ...

antahasthal.blogspot.com/.../why-not-tamil-or-gond-should-be-taught.ht...

Jan 31, 2014 - Why not Tamil or Gond should be taught countrywide inspite of Sanskrit as Dr Amartya Sen pleaded? Palash Biswas. For Debate. Why not ...

  1. Ashis Nandy says OBC, SC, ST most corrupt; FIR filed ... - Wn

  2. article.wn.com/.../Ashis_Nandy_says_OBC_SC_ST_most_corrupt_FIR_f...

  3. Jan 26, 2013 - Ashish Nandi has exploded the Bomb ticking against the bahujan Samaj for ... published: 28 Jan 2013; views: 66; author: Palash Biswas.

Ashish Nandi has exploded the Bomb ticking against the bahujan Samaj for Thousand years. He saidin the corporate jaipur literatuer festival that SC, ST and OBC are rtesponsible for corruption in the country.He said that corruption is mininimum in Bengalbecause these communities are deprived of power for hundred years!Intelligentsia stands in defence of his freedom of expression

In reference to this FB Post

Ashish Nandi and his freedom of speech against SCST and

http://youtu.be/2uknFfGuaHI

"নির্বাচনে ঠিক হতে যাচ্ছে সমস্যাপূর্ণ মানুষগুলির উপর মিলিটারি ছাড়বে কে।" — অরুন্ধতী রায়

http://shudhubangla.blogspot.in/2014/04/blog-post_1589.html


I reference to FB post by Alok Biswas


Alok Biswas


Dear friends,

Todays TOI published one artical in their front page comparing views one Non Nobel Laureate Jagadish Bhagwati with the well known Nobel Laureate Dr.Amartya Sen in the field of Economics.

As I found Brahmins have purposely made TOI to publish this in order to confuse our citizen. Plz denounce TOI and Jagdish Bhagwati, whose name is not so popular but now Brahmins will try to establish this economist as parallel and even try to establish greater than Amartya sen to meet their purpose.

Bhagwati said , Modi has vision of where he will take us.

Amartya Sen said, Minorities have reason to fear modi.

In such debate our intelligentia from every corner should react in favour of Dr.Amartya Sen and denounce sudden appearing Jagadish Bhagwati.

AlOk Babu,I differ with Dr Amartya Sen in many ways as he is a spokesperson for the global zionist free market economy.He has nothing against corpotae imperialism.He ha not convicted imperialism in his lifetime research work on famine.He highlighted only mismanagement in distribution.He has nothing against  inherent inequality and rcial apartheid prevlent in India which is the root cause and also the ultimate effect resultant in the invoked KALKI Avtar Narendra Modi.It is all about the colonial westminister styled peodo democratic autocracy which is sustained by the economist class as whole which is only concerned with free flow of crony capital all on the name of development.Economis refors have begun just on 1947 with continued selected ethnic cleansing.The partition of India killed the Big two power houses on people`s resistance in India,Bengal and Punjab which had been most militant against the colonial capital and at the same time were the epicentres of agrarian unity ie the unity in between SC ST OBC and minorities.


Hence the transfer of power for the colonial rulers to a racially supreme hegemony following the ancient feudal set up of graded inequality is the basic platform for economic exclusion and ethnic cleansing and no economist including Dr Amartya Sen has ever addressed this fundamental character of the state identical with the character of the monopolistic Zionist Brahaminical system.


My reader know it well that I have been dealing with this subject for decades.


I don`t consider Dr Manmohan Singh decisive in the phenomenon of this infinite gas chamber affairs in which we happen to be seized within.


The polity had been mastermindedly constituted to have a Parliamentary system based on the infamous Pune Pact which deprives the masses proper representation in every sphery of life including politics,society,culture and economy .Yes,Dr BR Ambedkar did draft the constitution of India.But the constitution assembly was in control of the hegemony and the West Minister Parliamentary system made  a polity of the ruling hegemony,by the ruling hegemony and for the ruling hegemony.


I did post the Citizenship Amendment Speech in response to Alok Babu`s post on the latest statement of Dr Amarty Sen.The hegemonial subaltern intellectuals are quite a misleading mind control team combined.Earlier Dr Ashish Nandi claimed in Jaipur Lit Festival that only the SC,ST and OBC classes are responsible for corruption.Later he explained defending himself in legal litigation that these classes are deprived and excluded and the corruption practiced them has some or other justification.


In his defence,Dr Nandi also concluded that nothing happened in the interest of the SC,ST and OBC in Bengal.Earlier,Sachhar Committee report also exposed the skin of Marxist secularism and hegemonial progress.I demanded an open debate on Ashish Nandi`s statement in respect to Bengal.But our friends ignored the call.


Meanwhile,Dr Sen has suggested at the same venue in another time that Sanskrit should be treated as the language of knowledge and it should be taught countrywide.What does it mean?I also responded against his hegemonial call.


I have been explaining all these years the phenomenon of free market economy and the so called reforms meaning total racial destruction of excluded humanity in this sub continent across the border.


We have to take  partition of India and the transfer of the power in consideration while we talk anything about polity and economy.


As for me I am in the line of thinking of Dr Anand Teltumde and Ms Arundhati Ray who see no hope of change with so called manipulated mutilated mandate only to push for further ethnic cleansing.


Since Dr BR Ambedkar succeeded to ensure some constitutional safeguards for SC,ST,OBC,minorities,women,labour class and even for every Indian citizens ie the Fundamental Rights , Directive Principles,Preamble to the Constitution (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_Constitution_of_India‎), Article 37 in The Constitution Of India 1949(indiankanoon.org/doc/76375/‎),FIFTH SCHEDULE

(lawmin.nic.in/olwing/coi/coi.../Const.Pock%202Pg.Rom8Fsss(33).pdf‎),Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution  and reservation in accordance with the Pune pact the masses somehow have managed to survive in the face of eternal Guillotine  in automotion.


Citizenship Amendment Act has been the first and fundamental act of genocide gestapo culture ie neo liberal policies and free market economy.It is meant for the deprivement of citizenship of the excluded communities including the partition victims in the best interest of corporate builder hegemony raj.


Alok Babu should have understood what I did mean.


Dr Sen`s statement regarding is quite insignificant for me.


Narendra Modi is not a factor,the factor is the institution of mass destruction which has already taken over the society,polity,economy and culture.


The economists are known for opportunist statesmanship.They never do address the issues which may unite the masses in resistance.


References and reactions


  • Palash Biswas Mr. PALASH BISWAS DELIVERING SPEECH AT BAMCEF PROGRAM AT NAGPUR ON 17 & 18 SEPTEMBER 2003

  • Sub:- CITIZEN SHEEP AMENDMENT ACT 2003

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9SiCcQGH1g...See More

  • BAMCEF MULNIVASI UDVASTU No.8(1)

  • Mr. PALASH BISWAS DELIVERING SPEECH AT BAMCEF PROGRAM AT NAGPUR ON 17 & 18 SEPTEMBER 2003 Sub:- CITIZEN SHEEP AMENDMENT ACT 2003

  • Yesterday at 1:14pm · Unlike · 1 · Remove Preview

  • Bhaskar Roy kon BAMCEF ?? Manyavar Kanshiram ji's BAMCEF na tar chinta vabnar opor prolep lagiye nijeder original BAMCEF prove korar cheshta kora BAMCEF?

  • Yesterday at 1:24pm · Like

  • Palash Biswas The speech was delivered in the national convention against citizenship amendments act.The speech has nothing to do with Bamcef factional infight.I am out of Bamcef.But it was only Bmacef which raised its voice against this draconian law other than the refugee orgs.

  • Yesterday at 2:32pm · Like

  • Alok Biswas Mr.Palash Biswas, BAMCEF to anekgulo aachhe. Tai ektu khule balo to bhai tomader BAMCEF er prodhan udyokta ke? Kothai kothai er shakha aachhe? Ei BAMCEF er mul uddeshyo guli ki ki?

  • Ei patai keno tumi anyo prasango tulte chaichho?

  • Tumi ki Dr.Amartya Sen er sathe akmat na ki modi bhakto Dr.Jagdish Bhagwatir sathe akmat? Kano akmat ba kano virodhi jukti diye ekhane likhbe ki?

  • Yesterday at 4:24pm · Edited · Like

  • Jagadish Roy কোন BAMCEF কি তার উদ্দেশ্য ইত্যাদি ... প্রশ্ন গুলো আমার মনে হয় উপরের বিষয়ের সঙ্গে সম্পর্কিত নয় । পলাশ বাবু একটা vidio link দিয়ে জানাতে চেয়েছেন যে , তিনি citizenship amendments act 2003 এর উপর speech দিয়েছেন ।সেটা উপরের বিষয়ের সঙ্গে কেউ যদি সামঞ্জস্য পূর্ণ মনে করেন , তবে তিনি সেটা সম্ভব হলে দেখতে পারেন । কিন্তু এখানে দেখছি প্রসংগটা ছেড়ে দিয়ে অন্য টা নিয়ে জল ঘোলা করা শুরু হয়েছে । সত্যি, কি আর বলব ।

  • Yesterday at 4:19pm · Edited · Like

  • Alok Biswas @Dr.jagadish Ray,..

  • Here nobody has tried as yet to read the exclussive article of TOI and no comments came from any body. This main topic is no way related to the topic started later by Shri Polash. I asked him whether he is with Dr.Amartya Sen or with Dr.Jagdish Bhagwati . He has not commented as yet and I feel he is not at all interested in the topic which I initiated first in this page.

  • As you must be lnowing, Brahmins are against Amartya Sen. Dr.Jagadish Bhagwati is not a man of principle. I never found logic in his argument.

  • Dr.Sen supports the reservation of weaker sections for their upliftment where as Dr.Bhagwati is dead against reservation to the weaker sections, just matching with Brahmins ideology.

  • What's your views?

  • plz give your comment.

  • 20 hours ago · Edited · Unlike · 1

  • Bhaskar Roy জগদীশ বাবু আপনি পলাশ বাবুর বক্তব্য টি গ্রহণ করতে বললেন,কিন্তু BAMCEF এর সম্পর্কে জানতে চাওয়া টা নিছক অপ্রাসঙ্গিক বললেন । এবার বলুন পলাশ বাবুর বক্তব্য আর আলোক বাবুর POST এর মধ্যে কী SIMILARITY আছে?

  • Yesterday at 6:57pm · Like

  • Jagadish Roy Alok Biswas বাবু আপনি post টির মাধ্যমে যে কথা সমাজ কে massage দিতে চেয়েছেন সেট খুবই গুরুত্ব পূর্ণ। আমি অবশ্যই এর গুরুত্ব বুঝেছি বলেই , বলতে চেয়েছি যে বিষয় টার উপর আলোচনা করা ই ভাল।

  • 21 hours ago · Like

  • Jagadish Roy Bhaskar Roy আমি লিখেছি -' উপরের বিষয়ের সঙ্গে কেউ যদি সামঞ্জস্য পূর্ণ মনে করেন , তবে তিনি সেটা সম্ভব হলে দেখতে পারেন' এখানে সরাসরি গ্রহন করার কথা কোথায় বলা হয়েছে ?

  • 21 hours ago · Like

  • Alok Biswas @Jagadish babu,

  • Then why we are not commenting on the main subject inspite of repeated request? Let us discuss on main topic leaving aside the un-necessary topics.

  • The unknown BAMCEF seems to be less interested on the main topic.

  • 20 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1

  • Bhaskar Roy জগদীশ বাবু আমি নিতান্ত আগ্রহ বশেই জানতে চেয়েছিলাম উল্লিখিত BAMCEF সম্পর্কে । আপনার খারাপ লাগলে মার্জনা করবেন ।

  • 19 hours ago · Like


No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Welcome

Website counter

Followers

Blog Archive

Contributors