From: Kamal Mustafa <kamal4000@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Ram born in Shishir by Prafulla
<I am just trying to convey that what is written in Vedanga Jyotish of 14th Century B.C. is trfsue for that time. But due to precession of equinoxes, that statement is not true in our period, nor was it true few thousand years ago.> This is yet another funny statement from you! On the one hand, you had said, "But the dispute is about relating Madhu Maas (month) with Chaitra. If it is not quoted in the original text how can you write *In this Vedic Mantra Madhu Maas (Chaitra ) and Maadhav Maas are said to form the Vasant Ritu.* which means that you wanted to know the Vedic mantras that have clubbed Chaitra with Madhu and so on, but at the same time, when given the proofs that the VJ has actually done so, you say that could have been applicable to that time only! What a strange logic! That is exactly what is meant by Heads I win and tails your lose! Is it necessary that I must keep on repeating like a defective audio system that seasons and therefore seasonal months are impervious to the effects of precession of equinoxes? If you are ignorant of the fact that the Vedic year and therefore Vedic months are seasonal, that certainly is not my fault! Or is it that you do not know even the minimal geographical fact that seasons are not affected by precession? Even otherwise also, why don't you use your common sense to judge that the VJ is a work of 1400 BCE i.e. about 1700 years prior to the date when the "almighty" Lahiri nirayana zodiac and the so called sayana zodiac are supposed to have coincided. Thus there should have been a processional affect of 1700 divided by 72= 23.61 i.e. about 24 days on the plus side, which means that the so called nirayana Magha should have not started simultaneously with the month of Tapas, least of all with the day of Uttarayana, as has been done by the VJ, but earlier by one month at the time of the VJ! Once again, it is also clear that you have not gone through the Valmiki Ramayana from cover to cover but are discussing the work like a scholar without being one! At least go through the work and then you will see it for yourself that Chaitra has certainly been described as the start of the Vasanta Ritu in the VR itself! It is also clear that Shri P V Mendki has either not gone through the VR from cover to cover or is deliberately hiding the fact that that work has described Chaitra as the first month of Vasanta Ritu instead of Shishira Ritu since then he may not be able to market his "Rama-janma-kundali" in Marathi. Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul
--- In HinduCalendar@ yahoogroups. com, kedar damle <damkedar@...> wrote Re: [HinduCalendar] Re: Ram born in Vasant and not in Shishir I am not trying to defend the so called mess created by others. I am just trying to convey that what is written in Vedanga Jyotish of 14th Century B.C is true for that time. But due to precession of equinoxes, that statement is not true in our period, nor was it true few thousand years ago. On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Krishen <jyotirved@sify. com> wrote: Â Shri Kedar Damle ji,
The seventh mantra of the Vedanga Jyotisham of 14th century BCE, which is the first indigenous astronomical work available as on date, has said --- In HinduCalendar@ yahoogroups. com, kedar damle <damkedar@...> wrote: > Lokeshji,
|
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment