Twitter

Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter
Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

Friday, February 18, 2011

Fwd: [Right to Education] EWS STUDENT DENIED ADMISSION BY 6 SCHOOLS – HIGH...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ashok Agarwal <notification+kr4marbae4mn@facebookmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:55 PM
Subject: [Right to Education] EWS STUDENT DENIED ADMISSION BY 6 SCHOOLS – HIGH...
To: Palash Biswas <palashbiswaskl@gmail.com>


EWS STUDENT DENIED ADMISSION BY 6 SCHOOLS – HIGH COURT ISSUES NOTICES TO SCHOOLS AND DOE  Note Of Proceedings Dated 18.02.2011  Delhi High Court (Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw) today has issued notices to all the six respondent schools and the Director of Education Government of NCT of Delhi on a petition filed by Kanishka through advocate Ashok Agarwal seeking quashing of the draw of lots conducted by the schools. The petitioner has also sought directions to schools for conducting draw of lots fresh after including her name.  Justice Endlaw has noted the contention of advocate Ashok Agarwal that the respondent schools being unaided private schools under clause (iv) of section 2(n) of RTE Act, 2009 are obliged to provide 25% of the strength of that class, children belonging to weaker section and disadvantaged group in nursery class, in terms of section 12 of RTE Act.
Ashok Agarwal 5:54pm Feb 18
EWS STUDENT DENIED ADMISSION BY 6 SCHOOLS – HIGH COURT ISSUES NOTICES TO SCHOOLS AND DOE

Note Of Proceedings Dated 18.02.2011

Delhi High Court (Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw) today has issued notices to all the six respondent schools and the Director of Education Government of NCT of Delhi on a petition filed by Kanishka through advocate Ashok Agarwal seeking quashing of the draw of lots conducted by the schools. The petitioner has also sought directions to schools for conducting draw of lots fresh after including her name.

Justice Endlaw has noted the contention of advocate Ashok Agarwal that the respondent schools being unaided private schools under clause (iv) of section 2(n) of RTE Act, 2009 are obliged to provide 25% of the strength of that class, children belonging to weaker section and disadvantaged group in nursery class, in terms of section 12 of RTE Act. "The petitioner being OBC belongs to the disadvantaged group within the meaning of section 2(d) of RTE Act, 2009 and therefore entitled to be considered by schools under 25% quota" argued Mr. Agarwal.

Justice Endlaw after noting the contention of advocate Ashok Agarwal that the schools have violated provisions of RTE Act, 2009 and Director of Education have not taken any step against the school, directed the Director of Education to hold enquiry into the matter and submit its report on the next date of hearing i.e. 11.03.2011.
Next date of hearing is 11.03.2011.

Ashok Agarwal Advocate
M- 9811101923
Date- 18.02.2011

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Welcome

Website counter

Followers

Blog Archive

Contributors