Twitter

Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter
Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

Monday, June 6, 2011

Fwd: [bangla-vision] MASTER TARA SINH, ONE OF THE SGINATORIES OF HINDU MAHASABHA [Mother all EVILS, according to Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)]



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DR AWATAR SINGH SEKHON <assekhon@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM
Subject: [bangla-vision] MASTER TARA SINH, ONE OF THE SGINATORIES OF HINDU MAHASABHA [Mother all EVILS, according to Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)]

 

MASTER TARA SINH [Singh], ONE OF THE  SGINATORIES OF HINDU

 MAHASABHA [Mother all EVILS, according to Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)]

Vishva Hindu Parishad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part of a series on
Hindu politics
Om.svg
Concepts[show]
Freedom Fighters[show]
Political leaders[show]
Major political parties[show]
Authors on Hindu politics[show]
 
Politics portal
Portal:Himalaya region
Government of India portal
v · d · e

Viśva Hindu Pariṣad (Devanāgarī: विश्व हिन्दू परिषद, EnglishWorld Hindu Council), which is usually known more simply as the VHP, is an international Hindu organization, which was founded inIndia in 1964.[1] Its slogan is "धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः Dharmo rakṣati rakṣitaḥ", which is supposed to mean "Dharma protects its protector". Its symbol is the banyan tree.

Contents

 [hide]

[edit]History

The right wing Vishwa Hindu Parishad organization was formed in 1964 by Swami Chinmayananda as president and former Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) member S.S. Apte as general secretary, with Master Tara Singhas one of the co-founders.[2] It was first mooted at a conference in Pawai, Sandipani Sadhanalaya, Mumbai on 29 August 1964. The conference was hosted by RSS sarsanghchalak M.S. Golwalkar. The date coincided with the festival of Janmashtami. Several representatives from the HinduSikhBuddhist and Jain faiths were present in the meeting, as well as the Dalai Lama. Golwalkar explained that "all faiths of Indian origins need to unite", saying that the word "Hindu" (i.e. people of "Hindustan") applied to adherents of all the above religions.[3] Apte declared:

The world has been divided to Christian, Islam and Communist. All of them view Hindu society as very fine rich food on which to feast and fatten themselves. it is necessary in this age of conflict to think of and organize the Hindu world to save it from the evils of all the three
—.[3]

It was decided at the meeting that the name of the proposed organization would be Vishva Hindu Parishad and that a world convention of Hindus was to be held at Prayag (Allahabad) during Kumbha Mela of 1966 to launch the organization. It was further decided that it shall be a non-political organization and that no office bearer of any political party shall be simultaneously an office bearer in the Parishad. The following aims and objectives were set before the Parishad.

  • To consolidate and strengthen the Hindu Society.
  • To protect, promote and propagate Hindu values of life, the ethical and the spiritual in the context of modern times.
  • To keep in touch with all the Hindus living abroad, and to organize and help them in all possible ways in protecting their Hindu identity also popularly known as Hindutva.

[edit]Ayodhya dispute

The VHP had been involved in the dispute over the Babri Mosque, or Ram Janmabhoomi, for twenty years before its demolition. This activity involved demonstrations, petitions and litigation. The VHP claimed that the Babri Mosque was built by demolishing the temple at the birthplace of Rama (Ram Janmabhoomi). The further VHP claimed that the mosque was in a dilapidated condition and not used for worship or any religious activity by the city's Muslims.[citation needed]

In the late 1980s, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) brought the temple issue to the centerstage of national politics, and the BJP and VHP began organising larger protests in Ayodhya and around the country. The feeling was that the issue was continually ignored by coalition governments and the secular-socialist Congress Party, as well as the courts.

In 1992 a large group of Hindus, including members of the VHP,[4] were camped on the site of the Babri Mosque. On 6 December 1992 the mosque was demolished by elements of the crowd. Rioting followed across India with 2000 people killed.[5][6]

The Liberhan Commission headed by Justice Liberhan was constituted to investigate the whole episode. A large number of VHP workers testified before the commission.

[edit]Ideology

Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (November 2008)

The VHP demands are broadly as follows:

[edit]Relationship with the BJP

Continually criticizing its political ally the BJP for acting too slowly on the Ram temple issue, conversions and a uniform civil code, the VHP demands legislation from Parliament authorizing the temple construction, and the proclamation of a Hindu Rashtra, literally the "Hindu Nation," in Bharat and explains it as a statement of cultural nationalism.[citation needed]

[edit]Meaning of Hinduism

VHP's use of the word Hindu(as with other Hindutva organisations) is to mean those people of Indian or Dharmic faiths and thus this broader use of the word includes Buddhist, Jain and Sikh faiths.[3]

[edit]Conversions from Hinduism

Question book-new.svg
This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed(August 2010)

The VHP claims India has historically been a Hindu nation, in culture, heritage and history. Islam was brought by foreign invaders who imposed it upon millions of Hindus, and perpetrated acts of Hindu temple destruction,pogroms and forced religious conversionsChristian missionaries brought Christianity to India when the PortugueseFrench and the British colonized the land. Christian missionaries often denigrated and demonized Hinduism to coerce native peoples into converting. VHP works to convert Christians, tribal peoples and Muslims to Hinduism. It states that all Muslims and Christians in India were originally Hindus, and that all citizens of Bharat (India) are naturally Hindus.

Law enforcement authorities have reported that the conversion processes have largely been peaceful and voluntary. However, there have been some altercations associated with conversion, and the subject of religious conversion is very controversial in many parts of India.

[edit]Stated Aims and Objectives

The stated goals of the organisation are as follows[7]:

  • To consolidate, strengthen and make invincible the global Hindu fraternity by following the eternal and universal life values based on Sanatan Dharma (i.e., Hinduism) and work for total welfare of humanity on the basis of the unique cultural ethos of Bharatvarsha.
  • To promote activities of education, medical aid and relief to the poor or any other activity in the advancement of general public utility for furtherance of literature and scientific and socio-religious research.
  • For fulfillment of above-mentioned objects if any activity is carried out which requires money to be collected in the form of sales, charges for boarding and lodging, distribution of books, literature, etc., then the prices and charges will be such that as far as possible they will not yield any profit.

[edit]Organization and leadership

Local office of Vishva Hindu Parishad, atHaridwar

The Bajrang Dal is the youth wing of the VHP, and it is organized in many states in major training camps called shakhas, where thousands of young men simultaneously train in various activities, receive sports and cultural education. The Durga Vahini, founded in 1991 under the tutelage of Sadhvi Rithambara as its founding chairperson and the support of the VHP, is described as the "female arm of the Dal". Members of the Vahini contend that the portrayal of their group as a branch of the Bajrang Dal is an oversimplification, and that their goals are to "dedicate ourselves to spiritual, physical, mental and knowledge development".[8]

The VHP organizes in community meets and shakhas throughout the country. Its national organisation is democratic, with an International Working President and an International General Secretary as their most important executives. However, only seasoned, senior leaders control the seats on the Central Council which will elevate men to the varying posts.

The Dharma Sansad is literally a religious parliament, a gathering of Hindu seers, scholars and high priests from all over the country. They rule on policy and principles and advise the executive on social and cultural questions.

The VHP is an independent organization of a socio-cultural nature, with many political activities. It has many active branches in North America, South East Asia and East Africa, where large numbers of Hindus live. It is engaged in numerous social development activities in hundreds of villages in different parts of the country, helping in their economic alleviation and cultural revitalization.

The VHP also have divisions comprising of women. VHP secretary Giri Raj Kishore charted out highly visible roles for women in the group. He charted out two "satyagrahas" for women during their demonstrations.[9]

The VHP has been a prime backer of the World Hindu Conference in which issues such as casteism, sectarianism, and the future of Hindus were discussed. Prior Conferences have included Hindu Groups such as Parisada Hindu Dharma.[10]

[edit]Communal tensions

In 2002, a carriage containing Hindu activists returning from Ayodhya was set on fire, killing 59 people. While initially police reports claimed the fire had been started by Muslims attacking the train at Godhra, subsequent reports have concluded the fire started from within the carriage.[11] These reports, however, are disputed. This event lead to the infamous Gujarat RiotsNanavati-Shah commission held it as a inhumane conspiracy.[12]

The VHP has recently engaged in several programs to reconvert Hindus who had previously converted to Christianity. VHP has advanced that conversion to Christianity had earned them no significant benefits and so their return to Hinduism was relatively straightforward.[13][14][15]

In Punjab, the VHP has played an active role to prevent conversions of Sikhs, especially low caste Sikhs being converted to Christianity. This is as a result mostly from oppression by high caste Sikhs, however the VHP have helped stopped Christian missionaries from converting Sikhs nonetheless.[16]

The VHP collaborated with Christian Association for Social Action and played an active part in providing relief to both Hindu and Christian families affected by the Love Jihad activity in Kerala during 2005–2009 period.[17]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

  1. ^ Kurien, Prema (2001). "Religion, ethnicity and politics: Hindu and Muslim Indian immigrants in the United States". Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (2): 268.
  2. ^ A lethal cocktail of religion & politics Hindustan Times – 27 July 2007
  3. a b c Smith, David James, Hinduism and Modernity P189, Blackwell Publishing ISBN 0-631-20862-3
  4. ^ [1]
  5. ^ Srikrishna Commission report,HVK archive
  6. ^ Human Rights Watch Official Report
  7. ^ Aims and objectives of the VHP,vhp.org
  8. ^ Women 'Ram Bhakt' hog limelight,The Tribune
  9. ^ Vishva Hindu Parishad Chandan Deep Complex, Jail Road, Gurgaon. Contact persons: Dr Inderjit Singh Yadav – Mobile 9312464415 Shri Mansingh Rahav 2580673 Kohli, Atul (2000). The Success of India's Democracy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521801443.
  10. ^ Historic world Hindu conference at Prayag News Today – March 2007
  11. ^ Spodek, H. 2008 "The Hindutva Labatory" in Modern Asian Studies pg. 3
  12. ^ Dugger, Celia W. 200 Are Dead In 3-Day Riot Of Revenge In West India New York Times. New York, N.Y.: 2 March 2002. p. A1
  13. ^ 3,500 poor villagers reconvert to Hinduism,The Tribune
  14. ^ Over 500 reconvert to Hinduism in Orissa,Press Trust of India Archive
  15. ^ Christians convert back to Hinduism,BBC
  16. ^ Rana, Yudhvir (31 March 2005). "VHP against conversions in Punjab"The Times Of India.
  17. ^ "'Love Jihad' racket: VHP, Christian groups find common cause"The Times Of India. 13 October 2009.

[edit]External links

[hide]v · d · eHinduismSymbol.PNGSangh ParivarHinduismSymbol.PNG
Organisations Om.svg
Major figures
Philosophy
  • Wikimedia Foundation
  • Powered by MediaWiki


  

__,_._,___



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

Fwd: [bangla-vision] THE SIKHS and the Brahmins-Hindus: The 27th Anniversary of An 'Undeclared' brutal war in the Form of "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, On the "Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under the occupation of the Brahmins-Hindus' democracy



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DR AWATAR SINGH SEKHON <assekhon@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:11 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] THE SIKHS and the Brahmins-Hindus: The 27th Anniversary of An 'Undeclared' brutal war in the Form of "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, On the "Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under the occupation of the Brahmins-Hindus' democracy/demoncracy/autocracy)" -Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)"

THE SIKHS and the Brahmins-Hindus: The 27th Anniversary of An 'Undeclared' brutal war in the Form of "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, On the "Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under the occupation of the Brahmins-Hindus' democracy/demoncracy/autocracy)"

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*

I am writing this 'unusual' message to invite your kind attention, as the subject is quite pertinent at least in my views. The 27th Anniversary of an 'undeclared' war in the form of a brutal military"Operation Bluestar" of June 1984 is approaching near. In fact, there are only 2 days left, i. e., 4-6th June. What I have to pointout is there were only 169 people inside the Darbar Sahib Complex, Amritsar, when the elite armed forces (army, navy and air force), with the USSR (Russian) intelligence advisors, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and other armed personnel waged a war on the 'Landless Sikh Nation, Sikh Raj, Khalistan, Punjab (under the Brahmins-Hindus' occupation. since 15th August, 1947). This had been done to take care of the Sikhs and their 'Landless Sikh Nation'. From the intentions that the elite forces of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' autocracy/demoncracy/democracy will 'exterminate' the Sikhs, defeat the brave Sikhs of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB. Punjab, which had been 'swallowed' by the 'unelected' leadership of the Hindus-Brahmins' India, came into being in the early hours of 15th August, 1947. In the War Room in New Delhi were sitting 3-Brahmins (P Chidambaram, Arun Nehru and P Rao), who directing the war operations on the Sikh Nation from New Delhi. The Punjab or 'Landless Sikh Nation' which had been cutoff from the rest of the world by suspending all means of communications and transportation and was under the imposition curfew round the clock. In fact, the Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which provides safety of citizens, was deliberately 'suspended' or rendered ineffective. Whether the then President, Zail Sinh, a stooge of Indira Gandhi alias Maimuna Begum, had any knowledge of the suspension of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, it is anybody's guess and a million dollar question.

Brahmins-Hindus' military might had assured Indira Gandhi that we will take care of the Sikhs (wipe them out in the pre-planned and well reharsed genocide of Sikhs and shut the mouths of Sikhs for ever, within in 2.5 to 3-hour).

In the Darbar Sahib Complex, there present were Saint-solier Jarnail Singh Khalsa (Bhindranwale), Bhai Amrik Singh, Bhai (former Major-General Shahbeg Singh, Baba Thara Singh, Babbar leader Sukhdev Singh, with his 12 more associates, and 152 staunch supporters of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.

Altogether 169 Sikhs fought shoulder to shoulder against the Brahmins-Hindus' elite armed forces fiercely. Among these 169 Sikhs, one female was supposedly Maj-Gen Shahbeg Singh's daughter, who fought with her father. She was on one corner of the Guru Nanak Niwas' roof (Langar Hall) alone and did not let even a single paratrooper alive. They all fell in the 'Sarover' or (pond) the place where pilgrims take their bath before paying their respect in the Darbar Sahib Complex, to their Guru, Guru Granth Sahib -the Sikhs' Holy Scripture.

These 169 Sikhs had fought against more than 3-Division of armed forces. They killed more than 30,000 well-trained, professional personnel (armoured corps, infantry, artillery, engineer (AME), navy and air force personnel. Military personnel could not enter the Darbar Sahib Complex, along with the Supreme Seat of Sikh Polity, The Akal Takht Sahib. Now, you may very well imagine, my dear older and younger brothers, Sikh youth and Barkhurdars to make a vague guess as to what kind of the 'elite armed forces of the Brahmins-Hindus' had/have been. Let us not forget that more than 6 Lt-Gen who have been directing, along with the Brahmins-Hindus, were the Sikhs, with their Sikh commissioned, junior commissioned, non-commissioned, frogmen of the navy and gunboat operating helicopters and IAF transport planes.

It was acknowledged by Lt Gen K Brar (a clean-shaven Sikh), we did not had that many casualities in 3 wars against Pakistan as the armed forces were inflicted by 169 brave and committed Sikhs, to protect the honour of their dearest religious and the institution of the Sikhs' polity, The Akal Takht Sahib. Had we had such courageous soldiers like these 169 committed Sikhs , the end result of the 'undeclared' war would have been far different (It must be noted that Lt-Gen K Brar used 'F***' word in his briefing to the news media). 

My dear older, younger brothers and the Barkhurdars, the Sikhs and Punjabi Musalmaans are virtually the same characters, except their religions (the Sikh religion founded by Guru Baba Nanak Sahib and the Islam by prophet Mohammad Sahib). So what? It is all the will power and spirits of the men who drink the water of 5-Rivers. Both the Sikhs and Punjabi Musalmaan brothers have the same spirits and courage. The spirits of the Sikhs and Musalmaans (now in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan) have been challenged by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' since 15th August, 1947; by the divisive, devious, and apartheid practicing creatures. The creatures who were 'subservient' to the Afghans, Mughals, Sikhs, British, Portuguese, etc., for more than 3,500 years and up until the early morning hours of the fateful day of 15th August, 1947. 

The time when the article is being prepared, both the Sikhs of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under India's Brahmins-Hindus' occupation) and Musalmaans of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan have been 'victims' of the "Terrorism of the Brahmins and Hindus" of the alleged Indian democracy, as the writer views it. Both the Sikh and Musalmaan victims have no choice but to face the unforeseen together and jointly. Let me tell the world that the Sikhs have no future 'without' their "Sovereignty, Independence and Political power."

Let the peace be upon us (the Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, and other non-Brahmins-Hindus minorities).

*Note: The author is the Editor in Chief, International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435
*****

__._,_.___



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

Fwd: OHCHR-Nepal and the log frame of impunity



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ACHR REVIEW <achr_review@achrweb.org>
Date: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM
Subject: OHCHR-Nepal and the log frame of impunity
To: achr_review@achrweb.org


Asian Centre for Human Rights
[ACHR has Special Consultative Status with the UN ECOSOC]
C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058, India
Tel/Fax:  +91-11- 45501889 25620583
Website: www.achrweb.org; Email: achr_review@achrweb.org


                                      Embargoed for: 3 June 2011

Dear Sir/Madam,

Asian Centre for Human Rights has the pleasure to share its latest report
titled "OHCHR-Nepal and the log frame of impunity".

The report is available at:
http://www.achrweb.org/countries/nepal/OHCHR-NEPAL2011.pdf

The summary of the report has been published today in an article titled
"Flawed approach", The Kathmandu Post and available at:
http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2011/06/02/oped/flawed-approach/222428.html

This latest 21-page report provides comprehensive analysis of the
performance of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights in Nepal.

On 10th May 2011, the government of Nepal announced a plan to withdraw
murder charges against Mr Agni Sapkota, Minister for Information from the
Maoists. Sapkota is alleged to have direct involvement in the abduction
and killing of Arjun Bahadur Lama in June 2005 in Kavre District. In March
2008, the Supreme Court of Nepal issued an order to the police to register
the case. The police registered the First Information Report but three
years later, nothing has been done. In the Nepal context, this
announcement is an effective declaration of an amnesty. The announcement
leaves the rule of law and the transitional justice process in tatters.

There has been no public comment from the United Nations Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal (OHCHR-Nepal). This only
underlines questions over the performance of OHCHR as it approaches the
end of its mandate on 9 June 2011. With the government of Nepal proposing
to extend the term of the OHCHR only for six months with the same mandate,
it is unlikely that OHCHR will speak up. Repeated evaluations have
underlined that the High Commissioner (HC) Navi Pillay must address
increasingly visible lack of political skills, leadership and strategy. It
is difficult to conclude that she has acted appropriately and there is
sufficient evidence to suggest that she has actively denied the Nepal
Office the support it needs.

The HC's mishandling of the mandate negotiations in 2010 is case in point.
Prior to the negotiation, OHCHR-Nepal had a powerful mandate, strong field
representation outside Kathmandu and, enjoyed a formal place in the peace
process; an agreement that the Nepal Government had no power to change
unilaterally. Yet, in defiance of the peace accords, and the prevailing
human rights situation, the HC conceded everything. The field offices
outside Kathmandu were abandoned. And, what is less well understood, all
new monitoring handed over to Nepal's imploding National Human Rights
Commission (NHRC).

Yet another emblem of dysfunction has been the recent decision, in January
2011 to place Nepal's National Human Rights Action Plan (NHRAP) at the
centre of OHCHR-Nepal strategy. It is now clear that OHCHR-Nepal gave its
political support to the NHRAP without actually understanding the content,
as they did not have an English translation of the NHRAP when they
announced support.

When an English copy became available, the scale of the blunder became
clear. The NHRAP is terminally flawed: poorly defined (indeed
non-existent) problems, ill-defined outcomes, ill-defined and vague
activities, activities that have little link to the problems and, little
link between activity and result. The approach to measuring progress is
almost uniquely process oriented, addressing 'number of attendees' and
training etc'. ACHR recognizes that development indicators in some cases
are well developed but the NHRAP is particularly lacking on civil and
political rights.

Impunity is mentioned only in passing; entirely consistent with the
current political environment. The interest in not addressing
accountability is a rare example of cross party consensus amongst the
major parties. The new government is no different, as the announcement to
provide amnesty to Sapkota and many others, demonstrates.

If OHCHR-Nepal is to have any meaningful role it must now demonstrate
willingness to undergo urgent reform. This should be signalled with the
immediate announcement of an expedited process for the appointment of a
suitably experienced and high level Country Representative. Technical
support should be immediately suspended. And supported by the
international community OHCHR-Nepal must now insist on concrete measures
of progress on impunity before engaging in any human rights initiatives
with the authorities.

Despite OHCHR's performance, it would be wrong for OHCHR to withdraw now as
this would imply that the concerns over human rights in Nepal had been
addressed.  The reality is the opposite; national institutions to promote
and protect human rights are as weak as or weaker than in 2005, the time
commonly believed to mark the lowest ebb of the rights situation in Nepal.

We thought you would find this report of interest.

With kind regards,

Yours sincerely


Suhas Chakma
Director





--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Welcome

Website counter

Followers

Blog Archive

Contributors